FOCUS: What You Need to Know About Wind Energy in Vermont

https://www.cctv.org/watch-tv/programs/what-you-need-know-about-wind-energy-vermont#

Screen Shot 2016-09-17 at 12.54.53 PM.png

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

VCE’s Investigation into the Environmental Health of the Lowell Mountains with Industrial Wind Turbines – July 2016

WATER

Screen Shot 2016-01-08 at 7.43.21 PM

1.  The “wet” ponds are predominantly dry or are not holding the volume of water necessary to provide water quality treatment as required by the VT Stormwater Management Manual.  Further, it is highly probable that instead of flowing through the outlet structure, stormwater is simply passing through the rock berms bypassing the water quality and peak flow attenuation necessary.  This seepage is also highly likely causing the iron seeps to form (see below).

DSCN5043DSCN5095

Stormwater ponds and level spreaders receive sedimentation that is regularly cleaned out and deposited uphill and seeded.

DSCN5105DSCN5119

Screen Shot 2016-03-04 at 12.57.26 PM

2.  The iron seeps that are being found at the project perimeter, and specifically downslope of stormwater management features is being caused by stormwater or intercepted groundwater flowing over sulfide bearing rock and leaching out metals, and in particular iron. 

DSCN5045

When this occurs, the seep is comprised of a low pH (acid) floc that will both smother vegetation, wetlands and stream substrates, but also create an environment that will preclude vegetative growth.   The preclusion of vegetative growth will lead to more soil instability and subsequent erosion. 

DSCN5144

See the geologic report prepared by a geologist retained by Princeton Hydro in 2011 and a paper on acid mine drainage and sulfide-bearing rock.  The extensive and irreversible changes to the surface and groundwater hydrology of the mountain will continue to cause environmental damage well beyond the perimeter of the area of disturbance of this project.  

BEFORE AND AFTER PHOTOS

PHOTO BEFORE – MAY 2011

DSC_0435

PHOTO AFTER – JULY 2016

DSCN5139

The headwaters of this mountain will be irreparably harmed.  The monitoring thousands of feet downstream of the project to comply with the Water Quality Certificate will not detect the impacts to the headwater streams.

LowellWaterQualityLocationsDistance

google earth 4 inlays

3.  The photographs also reveal that the level spreaders and the wet ponds are causing erosion of the hillside and, in particular, the “vegetated buffers” that were claimed by KCW to reduce the flow of stormwater and prevent erosion.  In fact, downstream of the level spreaders, the opposite is occurring. 

DSCN5176

The concentration of water in the vegetated buffers and other mountainside areas is exactly what Princeton Hydro stated would happen, not sheet flow down to the receiving wetlands and streams.

DSCN5171DSCN5160

This is important for two primary reasons:

A) The concentrated flow means the stormwater model that KCW used to show that they met the stormwater peak flow attenuation requirements of the VSMM is fatally flawed and is not meeting the standards and is increasing stormwater runoff from the KCW site.  The Water Quality Certification monitoring thousands of feet downstream of the project will not detect increases in flood waters that could impact downstream properties.

DSCN5192DSCN5217

B) The concentrated flow is clearly eroding the forest floor in the vegetated buffers and mountainside receiving areas.  This will continue to degrade the hillside and create larger and larger rills and gullies.

DSCN5126DSCN5123DSCN5214DSCN5159Screen Shot 2016-08-01 at 11.38.01 AM

EXISTING STREAM CHANNEL

Existing stream channel is being overwhelmed.  Sides are eroding.

DSCN5206

DSCN5208

LowellWaterQualityLocationsNoMonitoring

WETLANDS

In May and October, 2011 we visited this beautiful wetland near turbine 8 which be seen at the end of Energize Vermont’s video.

2011

DSCN3600

DSC_0452

2016

The wetland is mostly dry now, with a die-back of sphagnum moss.  This wetland was very special because it flowed both north and south.  While parts of Vermont are in drought, this area is experiencing relatively normal rainfall.  

DSCN5060

INVASIVE SPECIES

The evidence of the extensive use of herbicides on the site shows that the project is promoting the growth of invasive species of plants, which will likely be required to be eradicated in perpetuity.  The project is promoting the growth of such invasives that will eventually spread deep into the prior relatively unfragmented forest.

DSCN5111

According to the 2015 Invasive Species Report,

“A total of 51.5 gallons of mixture was applied at the designated sites across the entire KCW invasive plant monitoring area including the restored logging roads (see 2015 Invasive Vegetation Monitoring Maps). A two way mix was used for the application: Milestone VM Plus and Rodeo at 4 percent.”

Milestone VM Plus contains chemicals that are moderately toxic to aquatic organisms and have very high potential for mobility in soils.

DSCN5325-PANO

Rather than promoting environmentally friendly manual removal of invasive species, GMP has chosen to use huge quantities of chemicals, including at the edge of water.

DSCN5137

WILDLIFE

Wildlife on the Lowell Mountains are being exposed to wind turbine noise at very high levels.  Click on these two images to hear what the wildlife are exposed to now.

Screen Shot 2016-08-04 at 2.56.52 PM

Screen Shot 2016-08-04 at 2.56.19 PM

FORESTS

This area has been completely destroyed.

Montane Yellow Birch forest is now turbine 13

DSCN3767-Pano

The forest edges around the roads are dying.

DSCN5092DSCN5229

DSCN5280DSCN5335DSCN5304DSCN5248DSCN5249

ANR’s Eric Sorensen testified to the PSB in the GMP Lowell Wind case:

This project will result in the construction of 6.5 miles of 65 to 205 foot wide, mostly rock- blasted road and turbine pads in mature montane forests along a ridgeline in one of the larger blocks of unfragmented habitat in the region.

At the construction site for this Project there will not merely be a change in vegetation type, but instead there will be a complete conversion from mature montane forests to industrial wind farm. 

This area will be permanently altered by removal of soil, bedrock blasting, and regrading. We cannot predict what will grow on this disturbed site after decommissioning, but we can be confident that it will not be the mature Montane Spruce-Fir Forest or Montane Yellow Birch-Red Spruce Forest that occurs there now.

Ecologist Sorensen’s testimony is proving to be accurate.  The Montane Yellow Birch Forest is experiencing group mortality which is not normal.

DSCN5047

From ANR’s Eric Sorenson’s testimony about the Yellow Bird-Red Spruce Forest

Screen Shot 2016-08-04 at 11.10.25 AMScreen Shot 2016-08-04 at 11.10.41 AMScreen Shot 2016-08-04 at 11.12.30 AMScreen Shot 2016-08-04 at 11.13.00 AMScreen Shot 2016-08-04 at 11.13.49 AMScreen Shot 2016-08-04 at 11.13.58 AMThis image from the 2015 invasive species report shows the area of the intersection of the access road with the ridgeline road, along with the chart from the same report that shows that the invasive species are increasing and spreading every year.  These invasives will eventually make their way to the interior forest.

Screen Shot 2016-08-02 at 11.45.17 PM

Screen Shot 2016-08-02 at 11.42.53 PM

WIND PROJECTS IN VERMONT – OPERATING, PROPOSED, DEFEATED

Screen Shot 2016-07-30 at 3.28.18 PM

Key:  

Red Square: Operating: Georgia Mountain, four 2.5 MW 440 foot tall, Lowell Mountain, twenty one 3 MW 459 foot tall, Sheffield sixteen 2.5 MW 420 foot tall.   

Orange Square: Actively Proposed: Swanton Rocky Ridge seven 2.5 MW 490+ foot tall, Irasburg, two 2.5 MW 490+ foot tall, Holland one 2.5 MW 490+ foot tall, Windham/Grafton twenty eight 3.45 MW 490+ foot tall, Searsburg/Windham fifteen 2.0 MW 417 foot tall.

Green Circle: Successfully Defeated: Glebe Mountain, Little Equinox, Ira, Pittsford Ridge, Northfield Ridge, Derby Line, Newark/Brighton/Ferdinand.

This report was compiled by Annette Smith, Executive Director of Vermonters for a Clean Environment.  Most of the narrative was written by Princeton Hydro.  Photos are by VCE’s field investigator who will be writing more about his findings.  Information is from public records. 

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

S.230 proves wind turbine noise is a problem

http://vermontbiz.com/news/june/annette-smith-s230-proves-wind-turbine-noise-problem 

Annette Smith: S.230 proves wind turbine noise is a problem

Tue, 06/07/2016 – 9:48am —

by Annette Smith In his May 25 Letter to the Editor to the Rutland Herald, Peter Yankowski asked House Speaker and Lieutenant Governor candidate Shap Smith to explain his relationship with renewable energy developer David Blittersdorf, his partner Ritchie Berger’s complaint filed against me with the Vermont Attorney General, and the apparent conflict of interest that has resulted in the refusal of the House under Speaker Smith’s leadership to pass meaningful renewable energy regulation. 

I met with Speaker Smith in December 2015 and noted that for six years the towns, neighbors and public have been shut out of even having a conversation in the House about the need for standards and a better process for siting renewable energy. The sole purpose of the meeting was to ask how we were going to move forward in addressing the issues with renewable energy in the upcoming session. His response: “We’re not.”  Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

CCTV Victims of Industrial Wind Part 2

https://www.cctv.org/watch-tv/programs/victims-industrial-wind-part-2

Screen Shot 2016-05-09 at 2.02.21 PM

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

LEGISLATURE MUST ACT TO PROTECT VERMONTERS FROM POLLUTION

http://vtdigger.org/2016/04/28/annette-smith-legislature-must-act-to-protect-vermonters-from-pollution/

DSC_5720

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Wind Turbine Noise Testimony in Vermont

click on image or here to listen to wind turbine noise testimony in Vermont House committee

Screen Shot 2016-04-24 at 3.36.26 PM

Noise Control expert Steve Ambrose testifies about wind turbine noise (by phone) to Vermont House Natural Resources & Energy Committee, April 15, 2016

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Legislature must act to protect Vermonters from pollution

http://www.caledonianrecord.com/opinion/columns/annette-smith-legislature-must-act-to-protect-vermonters-from-pollution/article_98dbe0f4-ea51-501f-a63c-e824e84317cc.html

Legislature must act to protect Vermonters from pollution

Recently the Vermont Senate voted against protecting Vermonters who live near industrial wind turbines. The Senate voted against requiring sound monitoring to ensure compliance with noise pollution standards. Green Mountain Power’s lobbyist Todd Bailey of KSE Partners told Senators that GMP could not afford to pay an unsubstantiated cost of $264,000 for sound monitoring for its industrial wind project in Lowell. As reported in Seven Days “they (the army of energy lobbyist) got their message to Senator Bray and other Senators in a hurry. The Senate voted 18-8 to strike sound monitoring from the bill.”

It is enlightening to understand GMP’s opposition to the cost of sound monitoring at industrial wind projects in comparison to other costs at GMP. For instance, sound monitoring annual costs, estimated by ethical experts to be $50,000 to $75,000, pale in comparison to the annual compensation for GMP CEO Mary Powell.

According to the Valener Energy Company Management Proxy Circular, included with the March 22, 2016 stockholders’ meeting notice, total annual compensation to GMP CEO Mary Powell for the fiscal year ending September 2015 was $1.9 million. Her total compensation for 2013, 2104 and 2015 was over $5 million. Her total compensation consists of base salary, annual and long term incentive plan (bonus pay), current pension value and other compensation. Her current retirement benefit is $3.3 million. Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment